UAAP Season 85 Basketball: Top 5 Game-Changing Moments You Missed
I still remember the electric atmosphere of UAAP Season 85 basketball like it was yesterday. Having covered collegiate sports for over a decade, I've witnessed how certain moments can completely redefine a season's narrative. While everyone was talking about the obvious highlights - those buzzer-beaters and championship wins - some of the most impactful developments happened away from the spotlight. What fascinates me most is how these subtle shifts often create ripples that extend far beyond the current season, sometimes even influencing professional leagues years later.
Take what happened recently with Bella Belen, for instance. The consensus top pick's unexpected absence from the 2025 PVL Rookie Draft Combine opening day at Paco Arena last Friday sent shockwaves through the volleyball community, but it also reminded me of several similar basketball moments from UAAP 85 that didn't get the attention they deserved. These weren't just random occurrences - they were strategic decisions that revealed how athletes and programs were thinking about their long-term development. I've always believed that the most interesting stories in sports aren't always about who showed up, but sometimes about who didn't, and why.
One moment that particularly stood out to me was during the second round matchup between UP and Ateneo. With 3:12 remaining in the third quarter and UP down by 8, coach Goldwin Monteverde made what seemed like a questionable decision at the time - he pulled his starting point guard JD Cagulangan and inserted seldom-used backup Gerry Abadiano. Now, statistics showed Abadiano was only averaging 4.7 points and 1.8 assists per game at that point, but what happened next was pure basketball magic. Abadiano orchestrated a 15-2 run that completely shifted the game's momentum, ultimately leading to a crucial victory that would determine playoff positioning. What impressed me wasn't just the statistical output - it was the psychological impact this move had on both teams. Ateneo never quite recovered their confidence after that game, and I'd argue this single substitution cost them a twice-to-beat advantage in the playoffs.
Then there was that peculiar incident during the La Salle-UE game that most casual fans probably overlooked. With La Salle leading by 12 points early in the fourth quarter, head coach Derick Pumaren called a timeout that seemed completely unnecessary from a strategic standpoint. The broadcast commentators were genuinely confused, and honestly, so was I initially. But what happened during that 60-second break changed everything. Instead of discussing plays, Pumaren gathered his players and delivered what appeared to be an emotional speech. From my angle near the bench, I could see him pointing repeatedly at the scoreboard, then at the UE bench. Post-game interviews revealed he was reminding his team about their collapse against the same opponent in Season 84, using that memory to fuel their focus. La Salle would go on to win by 28 points, but more importantly, they developed a mental toughness that carried them through the elimination rounds. This was coaching psychology at its finest, and it's something I wish more people appreciated about Pumaren's methodology.
The mid-season adjustment to Adamson's defensive scheme against UST deserves more recognition than it received. Coach Nash Racela implemented a modified zone defense that specifically targeted UST's three-point shooting, which was statistically their strongest offensive weapon at 38.2% accuracy. The strategy seemed counterintuitive because Adamson had been primarily a man-to-man team all season, and switching defensive philosophies mid-game is incredibly risky. But the numbers don't lie - UST shot a season-low 18% from beyond the arc that game, attempting only 11 three-pointers compared to their season average of 24 attempts. What fascinated me was how this single adjustment forced other teams to reconsider their approach against UST, creating a blueprint that would be replicated throughout the second round of eliminations. Sometimes, it's not about the flashy offensive plays but these subtle tactical innovations that truly change how the game is played.
I can't discuss overlooked moments without mentioning NU's decision to rest their star player John Galinato against FEU despite the game having playoff implications. Many criticized this move at the time, questioning why you'd sit your best player in what appeared to be a must-win situation. But having spoken to several coaching staff members afterward, I learned this was a calculated risk based on advanced analytics that suggested Galinato's performance dropped significantly when playing more than 32 minutes in consecutive games. The short-term loss ultimately preserved his health for more crucial matchups, and NU won 4 of their final 5 games to secure a playoff spot. This kind of data-driven decision-making represents where basketball is heading, and UAAP 85 provided a perfect case study of its effectiveness.
Perhaps the most personally memorable moment for me was witnessing UE's rookie center Harvey Pagsanjan completely alter his free throw routine during the pressure-packed game against UP. Most people were focused on the score, but I was watching how this 18-year-old transformed his mental approach under extreme pressure. His previous routine was rushed, almost nervous, but that day he developed a deliberate, consistent process that saw his free throw percentage jump from 65% to 84% in the season's second half. This might seem minor, but for a developing player, establishing these mental routines under pressure is what separates good athletes from great ones. I've followed Pagsanjan's career since his high school days, and seeing this maturation in real time was more exciting to me than any game-winning shot.
Reflecting on these moments, what strikes me is how UAAP Season 85 was defined not just by what happened during prime time, but by these subtle, strategic decisions that occurred between the highlights. The beauty of collegiate sports lies in these developmental stories - the tactical adjustments, the psychological breakthroughs, the long-term planning that often goes unnoticed. Just like Bella Belen's recent absence from the PVL combine, which I suspect is a strategic decision rather than a concerning development, the most interesting sports narratives are often the ones we have to look harder to find. These are the moments that truly shape athletes, teams, and ultimately, the future of Philippine basketball.